THE SOLAR CYCLE PATH – one very dumb idea?

Krommenie's car-free cycle way, generating electricity. What's not to like?

Krommenie’s car-free cycle way, generating electricity whenever the sun shines. What’s not to like?

Am I in favour of cycleways? Absolutely! Do I applaud schemes to generate power from renewable energy sources? Who wouldn’t?(apart from our peculiarly short-sighted and shamefully irresponsible Australian government)

So laying a bike path that generates electricity through solar cells embedded in its surface should be a brilliant win-win. I’ve now pedalled across the 70 metres of experimental ‘solar road’, opened last week to some fanfare at Krommenie, a Dutch village north west of Amsterdam. I’ve also done some reading.

Sorry, but it strikes me as a very silly project.

Facebook has excitedly been spreading the word. Solar roads could be the answer to all the planet’s energy problems.

The idea of the Krommenie experiment is to measure the amount of energy that can be harvested from a bike path which otherwise just lies around all day reflecting sunlight. Why not collect that energy, and put it to good use?

I’m neither a scientist nor an engineer, so I bow to the expertise of Bard van de Weijer, science editor of the respected Dutch newspaper De Volkskrant. He has serious objections to the plan. Unfortunately he’s written them in Dutch, so I have to paraphrase them for my readers…

First, if you ride a bike across a normal solar panel, it will probably bust. To make it bikeproof, it needs a tough layer of glass over it. There goes a few percent of its effectiveness.

Normal glass is a bit slippery for bikes; like ice in fact. So the surface needs to be roughened. You guessed it, roughened glass collects even less sunlight.

Nothing wrong with it as a cycling surface. Smooth, but with enough grip.

Nothing wrong with it as a cycling surface. Smooth, but with enough grip.

So here’s a radical idea – put the solar panels on a roof, particularly a slanting one angled towards the sun. No need for a protective coating, so long as nobody gets drunk and proposes a high level bike ride challenge.

Proponents of the solar road scheme argue there simply aren’t enough roofs to support the number of panels needed to replace Nederland’s fossil fuel energy, while there’s ample solar capacity on the bike paths and roads. Mr van de Weijer argues that this is like putting the kitchen cutlery up in the attic because there’s more room up there.

I think he’s right. I noticed a few rooftop solar panels in Krommenie, but an awful lot of vacant roof space pointing directly at the sun. When Kommenie runs out of roof space, that could be the time to start on the solar roads.

Then there’s the cost – reportedly 3 million euros for the 70-100 metre section of Solar Road. You’re kidding? For that kind of money, I’m sure I could find a few cyclists prepared to hitch their bikes to generators and spend a few hours each day getting worthwhile exercise while contributing to Krommenie’s energy needs.

And I have another question. Why do we need to do the experiment on a real bike path? Why wouldn’t a square metre of ‘solar road’ out the back of the lab be enough to test the effectiveness of its energy collecting? Multiply the result by a few hundred and you’d have the capacity of the Krommenie cycle way. And don’t engineers already know enough about the durability of these materials to be able to estimate the product’s lifespan and maintenance costs?

If the system is demonstrably sustainable and cost effective, why would anyone just lay 70 metres? Why not 70,000 kilometres? If it really works, why not hand it over to a commercial company that can roll out a whole solar bike path network? There’d be a massive profit in it and good luck to whoever takes it on.

The whole thing smacks of an expensive publicity stunt. A local authority wants media coverage that shows it doing something good for the environment. Well intentioned, of course, but they know subsidising local residents to put solar panels on their roofs wouldn’t get people like me blogging about it.

It will be great if the solar bike path turns out to be the answer to sustainable, non greenhouse gas-producing energy, though I suspect if a scheme sounds too good to be true, it’s not true.

The project has already had one valuable side effect; it gave me an objective for another day’s riding. The scenic route from Amsterdam to Krommenie is about 37 kilometres. Getting there was more than half the fun.

The non-solar road to Krommenie.

The non-solar road to Krommenie.

If you’d like to comment, for or against the solar roads idea, I’d be very pleased to hear from you.


Filed under Cycling, Holland

17 responses to “THE SOLAR CYCLE PATH – one very dumb idea?

  1. It does sound a bit silly. I’m sure the money could have been used more effectively…solar panels on public buildings perhaps?

  2. “There was a town planner named Jack
    Who invented a solar track
    To harvest the sun
    On the cyclists’ home-run
    His efforts being rewarded with flak”
    (poor Jack!)
    If not that, what about this?

    • Stan

      Richard, your photo shows some of the problems. Even in winter the trees partly shade the path, with the summer leaves it will be much worse and in autumn, those same leaves will be on the path, along with any dirt that lands there or washes onto it.

      • To be fair, Stan, the test section is well away from any trees. Dirt is more of a problem, since bike tyres inevitably bring that. If it needs constant cleaning, up go the maintenance costs and down goes the efficiency.

    • Nice, Frank. And the glow in the dark cycle way is prettier than the ‘dull in the sun’ one.

  3. It seems that we are getting increasingly desperate to provide alternative energy.

  4. It is an expensive publicity stunt indeed. In my Houten times I was asked if we wanted to participate in the project to build a solar road in Houten, because of the attention as a bicycle city. Well, we attracted enough attention already and needed our money to build 2 kilometers of normal cycleways to the village ‘t Goy.
    But I am happy that everybody in the world now knows where to locate Krommenie.

  5. Antonina

    What about the ING building we rode past? How many solar panels could fit on the roof? And probably ING could cover the costs as well.

  6. A nobel effort, just not well thought out. But it’s a start. Here in the States it would be debated for years, never to be built until the next election, if then.

  7. Richard, thank you for an excellent overview, some beaut facts and photos. This is one of the pleasures of the internet – being able to see things through the eyes of others so quickly anywhere. As to cost, priorities and solutions for sustaining our cultures . . . well, it seems to me, the more options we explore the better. Here, however, there’s a clear problem – the unsustainable cost of the solar bike path. I’m guessing public money funded this project on public land? There’s not much competition there of ideas, the number of players is few and it’s rare to see innovation on public roads and lands. By comparison the rate and amount of innovation on private land is high, far higher than on public land. When I put solar panels on my house in 1996 they cost $26,000. Today, 18 years later, the same system costs about $3,000. Perhaps the same reduction in cost may take place for bike paths but not, I expect, without a comparable market for competition of ideas, players and technology.
    Just my thoughts, Michael

    • Thanks very much for your thoughts, Michael. Fine, well-informed thoughts as ever!

      I feel bad about criticising a project which seems to have its heart in the right place. Maybe it’s the forerunner of eventual, far cheaper ways of producing power from roads.

      But unless it can compete in ‘bangs for bucks’ with other sustainable energy generators, it’s never going to work.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s